A personal agent
for trade review.

Review the decision. Keep the evidence.

Bring your plan, recorded action, and notes into one review.

Review deskOct 7–8Open review
  1. Plan
  2. Recorded action
  3. Review

The entry came before the confirmation.

The Oct 8 note records an earlier entry than planned.

Plan
Wait for confirmation.
Recorded action
Entered early after a fast move.
Source noteOct 8 · Entry note
Planned to wait for confirmation. Entered early after a fast move.
What changed between the plan and the entry?

Your records. One connected review.

Compare the plan, inspect the evidence, and write what you learned.

Review deskOct 7–8Download review

Oct 8 · Confirmation entry

  1. Plan
  2. Recorded action
  3. Review

The entry came before the confirmation.

The Oct 8 note records an earlier entry than planned.

Plan
Wait for confirmation.
Recorded action
Entered early after a fast move.
Oct 8 · Entry note

Edits stay in this page until you reload. The agent workflow is in development.

A finding you can trace.

Open the note behind the observation. Keep what is missing visible.

FindingSource
Finding

The entry came before the confirmation.

Oct 8 · Entry note
Planned to wait for confirmation. Entered early after a fast move.
Not recorded

Why the plan changed.

Agents with a clear job.

Structure the record. Find the relevant note. Draft a review you can check.

  1. 1

    Record

    Plan, action, source IDs

  2. 2

    Agent

    Retrieve the note before answering

  3. 3

    Review

    A finding with its evidence

We plan to prioritize Claude for the initial prototype and evaluation.

How we’re building with Claude

Your records, within reach of Claude.

We’re designing an MCP connection so you can ask Claude about your ThinkerGain records, with the original notes still attached.

A question to bring to your records
Where did my entries differ from my plan? Show me the notes behind the differences.

The first connection will focus on finding records, reading a selected entry, and opening its source. Access will be scoped to your own records.

Read the connection design

Planned MCP connection

  1. Claude

    Ask about your own decisions

  2. ThinkerGain MCP

    Look up the relevant records

  3. Your records

    Keep the plan, action, and source together

The same source used in your review

Oct 8 · Entry note
Planned to wait for confirmation. Entered early after a fast move.
Open the review desk

MCP integration is in development. The connection is not yet available.

Built for a review you can check.

Reliable review takes more than a fluent answer. We are designing checks around the records, the calculations, and the final explanation.

Application logic

Calculate totals and comparisons in code. Keep source IDs attached to the record. Validate structured output before it reaches a review.

AI agents

Interpret notes in context. Explain differences between a plan and a recorded action. Ask when the record is incomplete. We plan to use Claude first for these tasks.

What we plan to evaluate

Source coverage
Can every factual finding be traced to an actual note?
Faithful summaries
Does the review preserve what the user recorded?
Missing context
Does it ask for clarification instead of inventing a reason?
Scoped access
Do connected tools return only records the user is allowed to read?

Notes on the product

What we’re building, and the decisions behind it.

ThinkerGain is in development.

Subscribe for product notes and early-access announcements.

Our focus is analysis of your own trade records and decisions. ThinkerGain will not recommend securities or buy/sell actions.

A subscription keeps you informed. Product access is not yet open.

Get early access updates